Laboratory glassware and scientific instruments

News analysis

The legal beat science has been missing

Research integrity, lab power, funding abuse, and AI externalities are no longer side issues. They are legal news stories about evidence, institutions, money, and responsibility.

Scientist working in a laboratory

Research misconduct

Fraud in the record

Fabricated data, image manipulation, plagiarism, fake review, paper mills, and disputed retractions.

University seminar discussion

Academic bullying

Power inside labs

Supervisor abuse, retaliation, authorship pressure, hostile labs, and institutional non-response.

Researchers collaborating around a table

Academic inequality

Credit and access

Authorship exclusion, precarity, discrimination, visa dependence, pay gaps, and unequal access to funding.

Documents and financial records on a desk

Grant fraud

Money and disclosure

False claims, duplicate support, conflicts of interest, undisclosed affiliations, and diverted research funds.

Briefs

What this desk will publish

Case briefs

Short legal summaries of misconduct findings, funding investigations, court filings, and institutional reports.

Source reports

Monitored updates from ORI, NSF OIG, DOJ, Retraction Watch, Science, Scopus, PubPeer, and journal notices.

Community dossiers

Verified submissions from researchers, students, whistleblowers, and institutional insiders with careful evidence handling.

Policy explainers

Readable guides to research misconduct rules, authorship disputes, grant compliance, retaliation, and due process.

Source desk

Monitored sources

Community

A verified social layer for science law

The social product should protect evidence, sources, and due process. ORCID verification is live now; Web of Science remains a portal entry unless its OAuth/API contract becomes available.